<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Users And Abusers of Online Publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/</link>
	<description>The (r)Eevolution of Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:23:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Kellogg</title>
		<link>http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-127311</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Kellogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 15:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/#comment-127311</guid>
		<description>The trouble with relying on reputation is that we tend to prefer people we agree with. Since the Web is by its very nature highly fragmented it&#039;s easy for us to find people we agree with who happen to have a high reputation. A reputation is only really worth anything when it is the assesment of a broad spectrum of even the smallest community.

In addition, you do need to get opposing viewpoints, and do some investigation of your own. I know of two men with high reputations in one community, and low reputations in another. In both cases the contrasting reputations are due to their opinions regarding the same subject. One community agrees with them about the subject, and so rates them highly. The other community disagrees with them about that same subject, and so rates them low. (BTW, it&#039;s not George W. Bush and the Iraq occupation.)

Really, the way things currently stand you can&#039;t rely on reputation alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trouble with relying on reputation is that we tend to prefer people we agree with. Since the Web is by its very nature highly fragmented it&#8217;s easy for us to find people we agree with who happen to have a high reputation. A reputation is only really worth anything when it is the assesment of a broad spectrum of even the smallest community.</p>
<p>In addition, you do need to get opposing viewpoints, and do some investigation of your own. I know of two men with high reputations in one community, and low reputations in another. In both cases the contrasting reputations are due to their opinions regarding the same subject. One community agrees with them about the subject, and so rates them highly. The other community disagrees with them about that same subject, and so rates them low. (BTW, it&#8217;s not George W. Bush and the Iraq occupation.)</p>
<p>Really, the way things currently stand you can&#8217;t rely on reputation alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To Blog or not to Blog, that is the question &#171; SEND IT!!!</title>
		<link>http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-126957</link>
		<dc:creator>To Blog or not to Blog, that is the question &#171; SEND IT!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 16:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/#comment-126957</guid>
		<description>[...] by p-air on May 8th, 2007  Scott Karp&#8217;s recent blog post on Publishing 2.0 titled, Users and Abusers of Online Publishing, makes some very good points about the issue of blogging and the challenges with trying to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by p-air on May 8th, 2007  Scott Karp&#8217;s recent blog post on Publishing 2.0 titled, Users and Abusers of Online Publishing, makes some very good points about the issue of blogging and the challenges with trying to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Tuesday squibs</title>
		<link>http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-126949</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Tuesday squibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 15:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/#comment-126949</guid>
		<description>[...] Users And Abusers of Online Publishing. Scott Karp&#8217;s bottom line: it&#8217;s not the technology, it&#8217;s the people. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Users And Abusers of Online Publishing. Scott Karp&#8217;s bottom line: it&#8217;s not the technology, it&#8217;s the people. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Kalehoff</title>
		<link>http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-126876</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Kalehoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 10:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/#comment-126876</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t communities, reliability and reputation tend to take care of that issue? The @#$^ tends to get called out or ignored; couple that with the fact that we tend to pay attention to people or sources we trust. In terms of trust, we - as a digital generation with infinite sources of information - are developing new conscious and subconscious means of deciphering trustworthy sources. It might be based on credible people you know pointing to someone you don&#039;t know -- or some other type of affiliation. What&#039;s in question is whether a universal framework for trust in a digital world will evolve across splintering venues, i.e., the blogosphere versus MySpace versus USENET versus any other network where people interact and exchange information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t communities, reliability and reputation tend to take care of that issue? The @#$^ tends to get called out or ignored; couple that with the fact that we tend to pay attention to people or sources we trust. In terms of trust, we &#8211; as a digital generation with infinite sources of information &#8211; are developing new conscious and subconscious means of deciphering trustworthy sources. It might be based on credible people you know pointing to someone you don&#8217;t know &#8212; or some other type of affiliation. What&#8217;s in question is whether a universal framework for trust in a digital world will evolve across splintering venues, i.e., the blogosphere versus MySpace versus USENET versus any other network where people interact and exchange information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Powazek &#8211; links for 2007-05-08</title>
		<link>http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-126851</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Powazek &#8211; links for 2007-05-08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 08:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/#comment-126851</guid>
		<description>[...] Users And Abusers of Online Publishing Â» Publishing 2.0 The thing bobbleheads like David Bullard constantly miss is that the web is not print. He might be shocked to discover that thereâ€™s another medium where people can say wherever they want, no matter now bad or wrong: it&#8217;s called a telephone. (tags: publishing journalism blogging) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Users And Abusers of Online Publishing Â» Publishing 2.0 The thing bobbleheads like David Bullard constantly miss is that the web is not print. He might be shocked to discover that thereâ€™s another medium where people can say wherever they want, no matter now bad or wrong: it&#8217;s called a telephone. (tags: publishing journalism blogging) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Powazek</title>
		<link>http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-126803</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Powazek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 03:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/#comment-126803</guid>
		<description>The thing bobbleheads like David Bullard constantly miss is that the web is not print. He might be shocked to discover that there&#039;s another medium where people can cay wherever they want, no matter now bad or wrong: it&#039;s called a telephone. 

If oldschool print types could see the web as more of a conversation and less of a &quot;authoritative publisher,&quot; they&#039;d probably be able to get more sleep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing bobbleheads like David Bullard constantly miss is that the web is not print. He might be shocked to discover that there&#8217;s another medium where people can cay wherever they want, no matter now bad or wrong: it&#8217;s called a telephone. </p>
<p>If oldschool print types could see the web as more of a conversation and less of a &#8220;authoritative publisher,&#8221; they&#8217;d probably be able to get more sleep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john harper</title>
		<link>http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-126798</link>
		<dc:creator>john harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 02:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/#comment-126798</guid>
		<description>Indeed - I remember just months ago when it seemed like every other print journalist is the country was being outed for plagarism.

The fundamental problems are a lack of integrity and arrested development.

http://open-secrets.com/2007/05/03/arrested-development/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed &#8211; I remember just months ago when it seemed like every other print journalist is the country was being outed for plagarism.</p>
<p>The fundamental problems are a lack of integrity and arrested development.</p>
<p><a href="http://open-secrets.com/2007/05/03/arrested-development/" rel="nofollow">http://open-secrets.com/2007/05/03/arrested-development/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Memories Reloaded ::</title>
		<link>http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-128703</link>
		<dc:creator>Memories Reloaded ::</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/#comment-128703</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; [IMG ì‚¬ìš©ìž ì‚½ìž… ì´ë¯¸ì§€]ìŠ¤ì½§ ì¹´í”„ì˜ ê¸€ í•˜ë‚˜ë¥¼ ë³´ê³  ëŠë¼ëŠ” ìƒê°.   ì–¼ë§ˆì „ ì§€í•˜ì² ì„ íƒ”ë”ë‹ˆ í•œì¹¸ ì „ì²´ê°€ ë‹¤ìŒì˜ UCC ê´‘ê³ ë¡œ ë„ë°°ë˜ì–´ ìžˆì—ˆë‹¤ (ë³´ì‹  ë¶„ì€ ì–´ë–¤ ê´‘ê³ ë¥¼ ë§í•˜ëŠ”ì§€ ì•„ì‹¤ ê±°ë‹¤ - ì´ìˆœìž¬ì”¨ë„ ë‚˜ì˜¤ëŠ” ê´‘ê³ . ì •ë§ì´ì§€ í•œ ì¹¸ì´&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> [IMG ì‚¬ìš©ìž ì‚½ìž… ì´ë¯¸ì§€]ìŠ¤ì½§ ì¹´í”„ì˜ ê¸€ í•˜ë‚˜ë¥¼ ë³´ê³  ëŠë¼ëŠ” ìƒê°.   ì–¼ë§ˆì „ ì§€í•˜ì² ì„ íƒ”ë”ë‹ˆ í•œì¹¸ ì „ì²´ê°€ ë‹¤ìŒì˜ UCC ê´‘ê³ ë¡œ ë„ë°°ë˜ì–´ ìžˆì—ˆë‹¤ (ë³´ì‹  ë¶„ì€ ì–´ë–¤ ê´‘ê³ ë¥¼ ë§í•˜ëŠ”ì§€ ì•„ì‹¤ ê±°ë‹¤ &#8211; ì´ìˆœìž¬ì”¨ë„ ë‚˜ì˜¤ëŠ” ê´‘ê³ . ì •ë§ì´ì§€ í•œ ì¹¸ì´<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMechanica &#124; web of mechanics and mechanicians</title>
		<link>http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-128704</link>
		<dc:creator>iMechanica &#124; web of mechanics and mechanicians</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/#comment-128704</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; Beam It Down From the Web, Scotty Users And Abusers of Online Publishing A Boston Newspaper Prints What the Local Bloggers Write &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> Beam It Down From the Web, Scotty Users And Abusers of Online Publishing A Boston Newspaper Prints What the Local Bloggers Write <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conversion Rate Marketing Blog - GrokDotCom by Future Now, Inc</title>
		<link>http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-132015</link>
		<dc:creator>Conversion Rate Marketing Blog - GrokDotCom by Future Now, Inc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/#comment-132015</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;  Users And Abusers of Online Publishing Posted 8 days ago How foolish would someone sound in 2007 making a sweeping generalization about what people do with websites? Probably about as ... [Link] &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->  Users And Abusers of Online Publishing Posted 8 days ago How foolish would someone sound in 2007 making a sweeping generalization about what people do with websites? Probably about as &#8230; [Link] <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Powazek â€“ is a thinker, designer, and writer in San Francisco.</title>
		<link>http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-140743</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Powazek â€“ is a thinker, designer, and writer in San Francisco.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing2.com/2007/05/07/users-and-abusers-of-online-publishing/#comment-140743</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; Users And Abusers of Online Publishing Â» Publishing 2.0 &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> Users And Abusers of Online Publishing Â» Publishing 2.0 <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: publishing2.com @ 2010-07-30 18:02:33 -->