May 20th, 2007
The Value Of Aggregating Content
Digital media has unbundled content, disrupting legacy businesses that sell bundled media like albums and newspapers. But that doesn’t mean there is no value in bundling content, as Nick Carr observes in a lyrical deconstruction of David Weinberger’s assertion that the track is the natural unit of music.
David Weinberger’s Digital Media Argument
For decades we’ve been buying albums. We thought it was for artistic reasons, but it was really because the economics of the physical world required it: Bundling songs into long-playing albums lowered the production, marketing, and distribution costs because there were fewer records to make, ship, shelve, categorize, alphabetize, and inventory. As soon as music went digital, we learned that the natural unit of music is the track. Thus was iTunes born, a miscellaneous pile of 3.5 million songs from a thousand record labels. Anyone can offer music there without first having to get the permission of a record executive.
Nick Carr’s Rebuttal Of David Weinberger’s Argument
And yet it is the wholesale unbundling of LPs into a “miscellaneous pile” of compressed digital song files that Weinberger would have us welcome as some kind of deliverance from decades of apparent servitude to the long-playing album. One doesn’t have to be an apologist for record executives - who in recent years have done a great job in proving their cynicism and stupidity - to recognize that Weinberger is warping history in an attempt to prove an ideological point. Will the new stress on discrete digital tracks bring a new flowering of creativity in music? I don’t know. Maybe we’ll get a pile of gems, or maybe we’ll get a pile of crap. Probably we’ll get a mix. But I do know that the development of the physical long-playing album, together with the physical single, was a development that we should all be grateful for. We probably shouldn’t rush out to dance on the album’s grave.
To recast old media with new media buzzwords, albums and newspapers are content agregation plays. Nick is right that the problem is not in the aggregation — it’s in the efficiency and flexibility of the aggregation.
A newspaper is one size fits all. It is created once and can only be dynamically re-aggregated with a pair of scissors. But that doesn’t mean hunting and pecking for content on the web is superior. Search is so successful because it’s a hyper-efficient, dynamic form of aggregation, creating “information-papers” around any key word. Digg is really just a dynamic newspaper.
On iTunes, an individual can aggregate music by creating a mix, thus creating an album. While consumers do highly value the freedom to buy individual songs, they also still value discovering songs that go well together in a bundle.
Disaggregation — taking apart media — is only step one of the media revolution. Step two — or 2.0 — is finding dynamic ways to put it back together.
Topics: Aggregation | Digital Media | Search
Powered by 
Design by 
Since the standard of the three minute song was dictated by the recording technology of the ‘1920s, it cannot be considered a natural unit, but it does seem to still work in the 21st Century. The fifteen to twenty minute on each side of a LP record was dictated by the technology of the 1950’s and this two-act unit of thematically linked three-minute songs seemed to work better than the forty to fifty minute one act CD dictated by 1980’s technology. Now, that our present day technology doesn’t so obviously dictate any cut length or album length, the individual listener, collector may bundle songs as they wish. Choice our most prized benefit.
Yes, I believe Umair refers to these as “reconstructors,” right?
http://www.bubblegeneration.com/2006/01/research-note-media-2.cfm
fifty minute one act CD dictated by 1980’s technology. Now, that our present day technology doesn’t so obviously dictate any cut length or album length, the individual listener, collector may bundle songs as they wish. Choice our most prized benefit. read more
Brilliant
The Value Of Aggregating Content » Publishing 2.0 - “Disaggregation — taking apart media — is only step one of the media revolution. Step two — or 2.0 — is finding dynamic ways to put it back together.”
[…] Scott Karpe habe ich gerade einen Mini-Diskurs zum Thema Content-Zerlegung und Wiederzusammenführung […]
[…] The Value Of Aggregating Content. Scott Karp digs into statements from David Wienberger and Nick Carr and comes to the conclusion that while the internet have been about disaggregation, the next step is finding dynamic ways to put the pieces back together. […]
nicely stated -
Weinberger’s notion of an album being the aggregate of free-standing tracks is a little simplistic - in some cases its akin to saying a novel is merely a collection of chapters.
[…] Carp about The value of aggregating content. His words: Disaggregation — taking apart media — is only step one of the media revolution. […]
The Value Of Aggregating Content » Publishing 2.0
[…] The Value Of Aggregating Content » Publishing 2.0 (tags: media socialsoftware content) […]
Twitter Fan Wiki - This is the unofficial place where Tw…Review: Weebly, The New Flexible Blogging Platform : The Blog HeraldThe 10 Best Places To Find How-To Videos30Gigs.com - Home to the 30 Gigabyte Webmail ServiceJay-Q - Jaiku Client for WindowsThe Value Of Aggregating Content » Publishing 2.0Die Macht der Blogger und Communities - Mai 2007 - Monat der Lehrstücke at franztooBuzka: Social Bookmarking With a Business FunctionIRC with OpenID? at Not So Relevant Linkblog Feed
[…] Publishing 2.0: The Value Of Aggregating Content […]
[…] The Value Of Aggregating Content disaggregation vs. aggregation — where are we headed? (tags: Aggregation media) […]
Scott, your last sentence is a pretty good summary of what “Everything Is Miscellaneous” is about: “Step two — or 2.0 — is finding dynamic ways to put it back together.” What new principles of organization are emerging as information, ideas, knowledge and creative works are moved on line? What effect does that have on the traditional authority we’ve vested in those who have done the organizing for us?
The book in fact spends a good deal of time arguing against the idea that there are “natural” units - I now of course regret ever having used that phrase in the passage on p. 9 that Nick quotes - and spends just about all its time on the potential for multiple orders in the huge pile of miscellaneous stuff we’re building … a pile ever richer in links and metadata.
David,
Thanks for stopping by to clarify. I’ve picked up a copy of the book and will definitely be reading past page 9.
[…] de analyses van zowel Nick Carr en David Weinberger raken beide een kern van waarheid. Scott Karp aggregeerde […]
[…] automated) playlists. But Nick Carr and David Weinberger both have a point, Scott Karp aggregates their opinions and adds some value…“On iTunes, an individual can aggregate music by […]
[…] Karp looks at two sides of a debate between two Web 2.0 gurus, regarding the value of bundling and aggregating content. Their examples focus on the idea of whether an “album” of music is a natural way to […]
Scott Karp looks at two sides of a debate between two Web 2.0 gurus, regarding the value of bundling and aggregating content. Their examples focus on the idea of whether an “album†of music is a natural way to bundle songs, and Scott brings that discussion over to newspapers. His conclusion: “Disaggregation — taking apart media — is only step one of the media
The Value Of Aggregating Content » Publishing 2.0
[…] ads to eyeballs. That is no longer the case. The internet, as various smart people have already noted, has unbundled content and advertising. But the old model created an unhealthy habit - publishers […]