May 22nd, 2007

Every Newspaper Journalist Should Start A Blog

by Scott Karp

  •  Comments

The hallmark of the new media revolution is that the balance of power is shifting to individuals — on the web, anyone can can be a publisher, individuals can make their voices heard through comments on nearly every item of content, and search puts individuals rather than media brands in control of content discovery. But a great irony of individual-centric new media is that this empowerment hasn’t generally extended to the individuals who “powered” old media — journalists.

The news that the San Francisco Chronicle is laying of 25% of its newsroom should be a clarion call to journalists. While most newsrooms aren’t in near-term danger of suffering such extreme bloodletting, the Chronicle is still a canary in a coal mine.

But what can journalists do besides bemoan the decline of the newspaper business and fret over the future of journalism?

I have a suggestion for every newspaper journalist — start your own blog. Today.

Why Journalists Should Blog

Starting a blog means:

  • Creating an independent publishing platform — blogging software makes this easy
  • Creating a platform for journalism that isn’t dependent on a corporate entity’s financial fortunes
  • Embracing the power and accepting the responsibility of being a publisher
  • Learning how to use the technologies that are transforming media
  • Putting your career on a growth track by not defining yourself as a print journalist
  • Creating an online resume that shows you can do new media
  • Becoming a node on the new media network — journalism will be networked

Some journalists already blog for their publications, and all journalists SHOULD blog for their publications. But writing a blog on a publication website is in many ways no different from writing a column — it’s just better software. No, journalists need to start their OWN blogs. (CyberJournalist has a list of journalists who blog independently and for their publications.)

How To Start A Blog

Here are five practical tips on how to start a blog and how to be an effective blogger that should remove any practical barriers for any journalist who wants to take the leap into independent publishing:

1. Use hosted blogging software if you’re not technically inclined
I think WordPress.com is by far the best hosted blogging platform. But you can use TypePad, Blogger, or any of a dozen others. The cost ranges from free to minimal, and it’s easy to set up. Just pick one and do it.

2. Use Feedburner for your RSS feed and your email newsletter
Feedburner will turn your RSS feed into a user-friendly landing page that shows people how to subscribe to your feed in MyYahoo or other feed readers. Feedburner also lets you publish your RSS feed as a daily email for people who don’t currently use RSS. Feedburner provides stats on how many people are reading your RSS feed and email newsletter, and provides basic website traffic analytics so that you won’t be flying blind. Best of all, Feedburner’s basic service is free, with very affordable upgrades.

3. Start with link blogging
You don’t have to commit to writing original content to get started blogging. Instead, you can simply publish links to things you read that you think are important, with some brief commentary. Get a Del.icio.us account and start bookmarking what you read. You can set up your “link roll” to automatically publish to your blog every day. Whatever you do, you should link to other sites. The more you link out, the more you get back — this is the fundamental law of the web.

4. Publish whatever your can’t publish through other outlets
Newspapers have finite space. The web has infinite space (which is a double-edged sword). Use your blog to publish what might otherwise have been left on the cutting room floor, or ideas or information that might not otherwise have an outlet.

5. Learn from journalists who blog independently

Check out the independent journalist bloggers on the CyberJournalist list. Check out Mathew Ingram, Jeremy Wagstaff, and Nicole Stockdale, and Kathleen Chapman and William Hartnett (husband and wife blogging journalists). Learn from journalists who already doing it.

UPDATE

Here’s an important caveat from John Roberts, which is informed by my tip #4 and which I strongly agree with:

I would add the caveat that it’s important to inform the publications you are working for about this “personal” blog. Whether it’s fair or not, drawing the lines between the personal and professional is harder — and therefore more important — for journalists, especially if you blog on the same topic in both places.

There’s no value for journalists in starting a blog with anything other than full transparency and disclosure, and ideally with the support of their news organizations — this may be a challenging path, but it’s something the news business has to confront.

UPDATE #2

I expected some challenges to this post, but not necessarily from journalists with independent blogs. Bobbie Johnson, a correspondent at The Guardian, argues that not ever journalist should blog, for a number of reasons, including:

Journalists have a job to do

And while that job might be able to accommodate blogging, it’s not always going to. The primary job of a reporter should be to get stories; anything else is a bonus.

Back when there was only print and healthy newspaper economics, this might have been a tenable position, but I don’t think it is any longer. Journalist have to get stories, engage with their readers, learn new technologies, and find time to blog — life has indeed gotten more complicated, but that’s true for everyone in the media business. Bobby sounds a bit like a newspaper executive still living in a bygone era. I needn’t point out that working at The Guardian, Bobby enjoys the backing of trust rather than the backing of Wall Street investors (despite The Guardian’s laudable efforts to operate as a self-sustaining business).

Bobbie goes on:

There are two constituencies for most journalists: sources and readers. In most situations one is a small group that informs the other – the source gives you a story which you then weigh up and translate, before imparting to a wider audience.

But what does a blog give me if I’m writing for a disconnected, digitally unengaged readership? In this case, the amount of work that I put into a blog isn’t going to deliver significant benefits either for me, or – more importantly – for the audience I’m supposed to be serving. If there’s a better way you can serve your audience or engage with them, blogging is just going to be a pain in the arse.

and

Obviously in the future, as generations grow up with a different level of comfort with online interaction, we’re going to see that model shift

Again, this is longing for a simpler time, where the readers were held at distance, waiting for the story, and the journalist could go off in a cocoon, work sources, write the story, and then deliver it on a silver platter to readers. But what if your readers can become your sources? What if they want to engage with you outside the context of the crafted, edited, printed story?

And the idea that this isn’t happening yet because most people still read the newspaper in print flies in the face of every newspaper circulation trend line.

After concluding his spirited contrarian argument, where he does make some good points, Bobbie asserts:

In fact I think most journalists should take some time to learn about the different ways of interacting with their readers. In the most raw terms, blogs can generate great leads, and in more ephemeral terms they can teach us a lot about our readers.

I couldn’t agree more — that is the spirit of this post.

Bobbie and Ian Bettteridge, another blogging journalist, both complained that I didn’t give enough recognition to journalists who already blog, and Bobby complains about the shortcomings of the CyberJournalist list of blogging journalists.

First, the whole point of my tip #5 was to recognize journalists who already blog and suggest that other journalists who want to blog should learn from those already doing it.

Second — come on, guys, you’re journalists! Instead of whining about the problem, do something about it. Jonathan Dube has gone to a lot of effort to create the list — if you’re not on it, get yourself added, and also send Jonathan the names of other people you know who are missing from the list.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post  Post to Facebook Share on Facebook

Publish2 Ad
  • I strongly support this statement. Experienced reporters and writers' voices are sorely needed in the blogosphere.

    However, I do wish to bring up the elephant in the room. Most full time bloggers even with journalist credentials will be unable able to replace the salary they'd earn at a newspaper. Blogging doesn't pay enough to live on for the vast majority.
  • Thanks for including me on that list, Scott -- and I think your post is dead on.
  • Mathew, are you kidding, you were the first on the list :)

    Webomatica, I agree, and nowhere did I suggest that journalists should or could quit their newspaper jobs. This is about establishing an anchor point of independence.
  • I would add the caveat that it's important to inform the publications you are working for about this "personal" blog. Whether it's fair or not, drawing the lines between the personal and professional is harder -- and therefore more important -- for journalists, especially if you blog on the same topic in both places.

    The best stuff, of course, will likely appear where you get paid to do it.
  • John,

    I definitely agree -- that's why I suggested journalists focus on publishing on their blogs what doesn't get published through other outlets, e.g. the cutting room floor.

    And, yes, it's absolutely essential to be transparent with your employer and strive to find a way to make it work.
  • Thanks for the link! And, shameless plug warning, check out the site of my husband and fellow journalist.
  • mac
    This is a great post that, I hope, will be taken seriously by journalists. The media industry is far too tumultuous to rely on a single outlet. Making inroads into an independent career -- even if it's for networking, practice, etc. -- is an excellent move.
  • Thanks, Kathleen, I added your husband to the list.
  • Scott says: "Instead of whining about the problem, do something about it"

    Not really fair, Scott: no one's "whining" here. Neither myself nor Bobbie were moaning about not being on the list. It's a laudable effort, but it's a voluntary list, which means that it's not a fair reflection of the number of journalists blogging. Some don't know about it, some don't want to be on it (for whatever reason).

    You also neglected my main point: journalism students are already being encouraged to start blogs in journalism schools everywhere - in fact, I haven't come across a new year for some time who hasn't at least started a blog. Not all of them carry on with it, but at least they know the ropes.
  • Ian,

    Your observation about blogging being encouraged in J-school is an important one -- I'm really speaking to an older generation of journalists in this post.

    The list is certainly not the only way to give journalists who blog recognition, but for those who don't know about it who would want to be on it, it's worth spreading the word. Or, you could have simply listed in your own post some other blogging journalists who you admire. I think it is important to recognize how widespread this is, but I for one enjoy being able to actually check people's blogs and see what they're doing.

    I enjoyed discovering your blog.
  • While I am a great believer in the power of blogs as tools for journalists, it is too sweeping to say that every reporter should blog. Like every form of writing, blogging requires its own set of skills. Some journalists will have the talent to blog in an interesting and stimulating manner, other won't.

    My students at the J-School at the University of British Columbia all had to keep blogs as part of their journalism assignments. Some excelled at the freedom that blogging offers while other struggle to let go of the traditional, hard news pyramid structure of reporting.

    Blogging does offer great opportunities for journalists to write about their world and connect with audiences. But just because any journalist can set up a blog does not mean every journalist
  • I'm a journalist who blogs a lot, both for work and play, but I'm with the "not necessarily" crowd.

    Blogging is just one of several skills you can develop as a journalist. A reporter who can blog is valuable, but so is a reporter who can edit. So is an editor who can create multimedia presentations. So is a Web content developer who can debug code.

    I don't see any need to force it. Some people aren't comfortable in a conversational style. Some have demanding daily routines already and couldn't keep up a blog.

    I suppose it's useful in seeing how Web conversations work, but not all Web conversations are the same. Some blogs attract interesting conversation, but some attract nothing but cranks.

    And it's a mistake -- a mistake that's spreading through journalism -- to assume that the audience you get on your blog is necessarily representative of your readership as a whole. That's particularly true at newspaper sites, where readers have long been passive and aren't going to make the leap to active participants overnight. Besides, if the conversation is heated or borderline distasteful, many readers won't want to enter the fray.

    The only mandatory exercise I'd recommend for journalists is that everyone should spend at least a year on a copy desk. Learn what it means to work for a living. :)
  • I've been lucky this year, my employers have asked me to write a blog about biofuels, devise some web TV and web radio products and help develop the consumer side of a purely subcription play website. OK so I don't do any paper based journalism any more, but I managed to do that and work on a blog for the global chemicals industry in the gaps in my day. [check out Chemical Industry Insider on blogger] I guess if you're "can do" then you can do it, if you aren't then you wont.
  • Mike
  • I agree too. This is the way of the future for many journalists out there.
  • re reporter
    I totally agree with this in theory. But what about the fact that this takes time and journalists are used to getting paid to perform their craft? No one should work for free and plenty of folks have learned that while blogging brings about great networking opportunities and recognition, it does not pay the bills for most people.

    We all know that journalists should blog -- they know how to be trustworthy information-givers. What we need to know more of is how journalists who no longer have the security of a newsroom job can make a living blogging on their own.
  • Every journalist should blog.
    - Job security - too much change in publishing.
    - Build your brand - take your audience with you, whether online or print.
    - Learn new technologies - writing skills alone won't be enough.

    We need to bring more professional quality to blogging.
  • I couldn't agree more with this! Check out mine! http://journalism3.wordpress.com/
blog comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe

Receive a free daily email newsletter with new Publishing 2.0 posts


Recent Posts

Media 2.0 Workgroup
Publish2 Ad
Clicky Web Analytics