July 19th, 2007

Memo to Google: Buy Yahoo!

by Robert Young

Why should Google buy Yahoo? With the exception of search, Yahoo’s strengths map to Google’s weaknesses, almost precisely. Consider the following:

  • Yahoo! Mail, which accounts for almost 50% of the free email market, has more than 10 times the market share of Gmail;
  • Yahoo! Answers is a major hit… Google Answers failed;
  • Yahoo’s Flickr is a runaway hit… far outpacing Google’s Picasa photo site;
  • In critical verticals, like finance, Yahoo remains the clear leader despite much effort by Google;
  • Both Yahoo! and Google are cozying up to the newspaper industry with their respective efforts. Combine the two efforts and a successful outcome for all parties is almost guaranteed;
  • Want to acquire display/brand ad expertise? Forget DoubleClick — Yahoo’s ad sales expertise and relationships with big Madison Ave brands and agencies are far superior. Besides, as long as Google’s going to get scrutinized under federal antitrust regulators, and now Congress, might as well go through all that headache with the promise of a much bigger catch at the end.

I could go on, but I trust you get the gist. My point is that a merger of the two Internet giants would actually be a case of strength combining with strength… and not weak combining with weak, as a Microsoft acquisition of Yahoo! would represent.

Put another way, such a deal would completely obfuscate Yahoo’s greatest weakness vs. Google, which is search of course, and render that element almost irrelevant…whereas any other acquirer would effectively be inheriting that weakness.

  • It's funny how even Google can get worked by Yahoo in certain markets. Gotta love it!

  • jmw

    Kneejerk reaction? Too bad Yahoo can't buy Google. Second thought...they each do what they do extremely well. I hate the conglomerate. Newsflash...MSFT is older, but it is learning from each of their expertise too.

  • Great idea. Several problems....

    1. Will probably get hung up in anti-trust review. 2. Guess who will make a big stink? MSFT.
    3. Not sure if the Chief Yahoo is ready to report to the Chief Googlers too.

  • Neo

    My take on what Yahoo should do -
    Step 1 - Start awarding points to its users as they search/research/shop on its sites.

    Give users an incentive to do all online activity thru Yahoo. Search is important so is online shopping, travel etc. Focus on these as well and aim to be number one in areas other than search.

    For more read -- http://ideaposts.com/blog/

  • Jack B

    One of the very few blog posts that actually makes analytical sense - great insight. An alternative/variant to this thinking is for Yahoo to simply sell Altavista/Inktomi (i.e. yahoo search) to Google b/c Google basically sucks at anything that doesn't revolving around analytic monetization, whereas Yahoo has a lot more consumer branding experience. I would convert Yahoo into another myspace/facebook that focuses purely on great interactive content and experience and then let Google focus on monetization.

  • It may make a degree of business sense, but would the cultures be compatible? I get the feeling Google would rather build something new than buy it, even something like Yahoo!.

  • Yahoo visitors spend much more time on site than Google's. Microsoft needs to buy Yahoo. If they do they will probably ruin it, but they need it.

  • Robert, sorry about that - this is the first time I've seen a guest blogger on publishing 2

  • It makes sense, but what about competition? Microsoft products suck because they don't have enough competition because they kill competition. Yahoo! and Google both have their strengths and weaknesses but they are healthy alternatives. When I don't find something on Google I go to Yahoo and vice-versa.

    Yahoo! mail has greater share because it is one of the oldest email tools. Gmail played snob from the beginning by letting people have accounts only by invitation (although their interface is far better).

    And you are right about Yahoo! Answers; they are far better. Didn't Google strop providing answers some time back? I think they did.

  • Dont think! this should happen, since this Goohoo! Yahgle! doesnt make sense since this would lead to a complete monopoly and they would start dictating terms! Internet that is free world economy would be killed, specially when these two internet giants are competing, the consumer (internet surfer) is benefitting

  • @Eric,
    There's a very good chance you're right, of course. That said, it's a good thing Microsoft is out there... with 90% of the operating system market and a much larger market cap.

    @Doug,
    Thanks! But my name is Robert ;-)

  • Great post Scott - I think you nailed it. Is GOOG looking into this?

  • Eric

    I got one word for that scenario: antitrust.

    I don't care how right wing and big-business friendly the federal government is these days - there's simply no way they'd let a merger go through given that the combined entity would control 80+% of the search market and some similarly large share of the online advertising market.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe

Receive new posts by email

Recent Posts