Comments on: Email Is NOT Dead

By: Of Prosumer Content Creation - The LearningMate Blog

Of Prosumer Content Creation - The LearningMate Blog — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:01:20 +0000

[...] RSS. Email is not dead. If you had any doubts about it, head over to Scott Karp’s post about email being very much alive and kicking, at Publishing [...]

By: agentgenius.com- national real estate opinion column » Blog Archive » How Local Should You Go?

Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:19:36 +0000

[...] sure how many people around here actually subscribe to feeds, but most of them use email. Those email addresses are gold. The content must be credible to gain [...]

By: Managing your copywriting business via email » Seven Days To Easy-Money: Copywriting Success

Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:31:23 +0000

[...] Scott Karp says, “Email Is NOT Dead”: Inboxes are getting flooded by email from other online communication services like Facebook, [...]

By: Alexander van Elsas

Alexander van Elsas — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:49:41 +0000

E-mail is not dead, but it does have a few fundamental flaws that need correction. I have written a few times about this. Given the overhyped reactions to Facebook, I never really understood why Yahoo, Google, and Microsoft haven’t fundamentally improved email yet. They already have the user base, so that is covered. When looking at e-mail from a user perspective, it becomes easy to think of (social) improvements for it.
If interested, I wrote 9 requests (post got too long)to improve e-mail. some of these might actually get implemented now I hope:
http://vanelsas.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/dear-yahoo-microsoft-google-e-mail-forget-facebook-start-innovating/

By: Greg Cangialosi

Greg Cangialosi — Sun, 18 Nov 2007 17:06:28 +0000

Scott –

AMEN! Its completely absurd. Email is the DRIVER, the connector, and whether people want to believe it or not, its role is shifting and becoming more important than ever. This is in regards to it as a marketing medium as well as a social medium.

Email is the currency of all accounts for all of these other services, and isn’t going anywhere

Thanks for your post.

- Greg

By: links for 2007-11-17 | hombrelobo, una mente dispersa

links for 2007-11-17 | hombrelobo, una mente dispersa — Sat, 17 Nov 2007 23:23:15 +0000

[...] Email Is NOT Dead – Publishing 2.0 EVERYONE HAS EMAIL. That’s why we all get so much spam and other useless email — because it’s a guaranteed way to reach us. (tags: hl) [...]

By: Mark Evans

Mark Evans — Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:07:22 +0000

You’re right on the mark. The ubiquity of e-mail vs. Twitter, Facebook, et al is why is will continue to rule the roost.

By: The Daily Square - Guarded By Monkeys Edition | Booksquare

The Daily Square - Guarded By Monkeys Edition | Booksquare — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:59:16 +0000

[...] Email Is NOT DeadJust in case you were asking. [...]

By: JSmith

JSmith — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:22:43 +0000

So your point is that trends that start out in a new generation aren’t really trends because when those teens reach their twenties their learned behavior is overwhelmed by the behavior of the last generation?

Good theory.

I can’t email my 14 year old daughter because she doesn’t use email. She also doesn’t have a phone in her room (the teenage cliche of the last-last generation).

That’s not going to change when she graduates college.

That’s why all those damned new-fangled computers never made it into the business world — all those IBM Selectrics!

Nonsensical.

By: Krish

Krish — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:09:51 +0000

Scott, you are right. There is no way email is going to die so soon. Also, when people talk about a “closed system” replacing an “open system” like email, it amuses me. The main reason why email was successful in the business community is because anyone can contact you through email (an “open system”) much like the postal mail or telephone. Twitter, Facebook, IMs (“closed systems” where one needs to get approved before they could even communicate) may replace email to a certain extent. Such “closed systems” cannot kill email. If at all email is getting killed, it will be done only by another “open system” that can perform better than email.

By: Leo Klein

Leo Klein — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:06:38 +0000

The big joke is that it’s “the kids” who are routinely rolled out as Exhibit No. 1 on how Email is dead.

Then you find out that all they’ve got to communicate with all day long is a cell-phone. Is it any wonder they text-message?

It’s all they got!

When they finally make the switch from cell-phone to smart phone, they’ll be back emailing like the rest of us.

By: Email is Still Not Dead| Zoli’s Blog

Email is Still Not Dead| Zoli’s Blog — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 04:31:21 +0000

[...] Related posts: mathewingram.com/work, Techdirt, Fractals of Change, Don Dodge, WebProNews, Thomas Hawk’s Digital …, Andrew Hyde and This is going to be BIG., Rev2.org, CrunchGear, A VC , Good Morning Silicon Valley, Socialtext Enterprise … , Between the Lines, Publishing 2.0, [...]

By: Is email dead? No, but it’s not well - - mathewingram.com/work

Is email dead? No, but it’s not well - - mathewingram.com/work — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 03:17:30 +0000

[...] My friend Scott Karp at Publishing 2.0 says that he thinks the whole “email is dead” meme is ridiculous. [...]

By: Mathew Ingram

Mathew Ingram — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 02:47:31 +0000

True — but everyone also HATES EMAIL

By: Thomas Hawk

Thomas Hawk — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 02:16:37 +0000

My email activity has gone down 80% in the last two years. Most email just never gets addressed. I’m hoping that the remaining 20% use gets eliminated over the course of the next few years.

Sending an email is simply too easy. Spam won’t overtake social networks to the extent that it has email because social networks have more to lose. If Facebook becomes a haven for spam then people will switch to something else and it will cost them. They have an economic interest to stop spam on their site. Nobody has an economic interest to stop spam in my inbox — or at least a serious enough economic interest to do anything about it.

Mention spam and people say that they can’t do anything about it. That it’s all people in Russia and China, etc. But make it harder to email. Require registration on a service with an opt in model that makes it harder to send 100,000 spam email messages at once and it will be more effective.

The thing with the youth is that every day there are more and more of them while every day there are less and less of the rest of us.

Email will still be around, but it will be significantly less relevant in the future as other better forms of communication evolve and develop.

By: Tony Hung

Tony Hung — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 02:14:08 +0000

@Scott — ha ha! You are preaching to the _CONVERTED_, Scott!

By: Scott Karp

Scott Karp — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:59:07 +0000

@Tony, what fun would blogging be if you couldn’t over-emphasize the obvious in all caps?

By: Tony Hung

Tony Hung — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:56:45 +0000

Wait — *who* has email?

By: Doug

Doug — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:51:49 +0000

Thomas Hawk calls himself a “digital media enthusiast” and he declares email dead? Its got to be a publicity stunt.

Email is as powerful as ever. The email newsletter still trums RSS.

By: Paul L. McCord Jr.

Paul L. McCord Jr. — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:45:08 +0000

I like your story. I completely agree with your points. I originally read Thomas Hawk’s story and I thought it was not very realistic. I do have to agree that I cannot get my kids to use email. Myspace has its limitations in that you cannot send files. Anyway, good post.

Paul