December 30th, 2007

Email And Cellphone Contacts Are The Real Social Graph

by

Google has been quietly rolling out social features across all of its services based on Gmail contacts. While Google still has to overcome some of its social tone-deafness (e.g. automatically adding contacts without asking), this move makes perfect sense. For people over 30 (and probably even over 25) email IS the social graph.

Most people over 30 don’t have many (or any) business or personal relationships that don’t involve communicating by email. There are very few people who matter to me with whom I do not regularly communicate by email. Nearly every causal business relationship becomes more substantive through email communication. The only communication platform everyone in my family shares is email.

What’s interesting when you think about email as the social graph is that there is a much higher relationship threshold for email. I’ve been added as a “friend” on Facebook by people I’ve never met, don’t know, and have never communicated with. Same with LinkedIn. It’s way to easy to “add” someone on a social networking application. Just click a button.

Sending someone an email, in contrast, actually requires having something to say. It requires introducing yourself. It requires actually COMMUNICATING substantively, rather than just empty gestures like adding, poking or sending virtual beer.

Want more evidence that, far from being dead, email is the adult social graph? Check out the most recent quarterly earnings report for RIM, who makes the Blackberry. Revenue rose year-over-year to $1.67 billion from $835.1 million. From what? Selling EMAIL devices.

So what about for people under 30? Over the holiday, I did some ethnographic research with various family members between the ages of 17 and 23. As expected, they check email infrequently, because they are still in school and haven’t yet had a business email and its obligations thrust upon them.

What’s interesting is that they don’t us IM much either, nor do they use Facebook or MySpace much. So what do they do? They text each other on their phones.

And, get this…they call each other and actually TALK. Can you believe it? Social networking through actual direct human communication.

Unlike most people in the business world, students aren’t in front of their computers all day long. Their cell phones are their main computing devices. So their social graph is their cell phone contact list. The people they text and call.

I saw these young adults away from their computers all day without concern, but they were checking their cellphones constantly. The same way older demographics check their Blackberries.

It seema that we are increasingly inclined to take our social graphs with us — but not through web-based social networking applications.

I spent a lot of time with non-geeks over the holidays, and while I heard mention of email, texting, and cellphones in casual conversation over many days, I didn’t hear a single mention of Facebook, MySpace, or any other web-based social networking application.

If you prefer numbers over anecdotal evidence, just following the money — consider: Why is RIM so profitable? Why do people pay so much money for cell phone service and text messages? Why is there so much money in email spam?

Facebook’s $15 billion valuation suggests that that dollars are about to flow into the social graphs based on proprietary web applications. Would you bet on that, or an open social platforms like email, SMS, and….phone numbers?

  • thanks for the heads up re: Jaiku - i am looking into it and curious how it contrasts twitter.

    i am a big fan of being tracking - my argument would be it would create less communication around "connecting" and finding people and more space to communication as related to creating futures! ;-)

  • And when you consider that Google did buy Jaiku, that is big addition to real social networking tools. If they integrate it systemwide with Gmail/Gtalk and allow users communicate from Jaiku mobile addressbook together with their location information, it could be quite great business application. Combine that with functionality of photo- and videoblogs etc. other services and you start to see larger picture. They already have software for mobile phones, they just need to improve it based on new ideas and larger needs for communication tools.

    One thing that need to be noted is that users should have good ways to control amount and type of data shared. I know that tracking of movements of mobile phone sounds quite bad thing in privacy aspects, but many people would still use it.

  • sembland

    Nice!....I like it..I personally like the cellphone than the email because of the mobility it provides…I actually also use it for networking more than the internet…I’ve been a part of the mobile mob from Mozes and it gives me instant updates for all the bands mob I’ve joined. I like it. I’m going to stick with my cell phone.

  • Yup, I agree... did a similar blog post recently...

    http://www.networkweaving.com/...

    Also, my 15 yo son, says NO does FB or MS at his school... mostly texting, on-line gaming, YT, and some email! Yes, the cell-phone is THE device for his group.

  • wow - this is right on!

    i discovered i was getting back to the "ole skool" with my iPhone after walking away from email for a good 3 months. the SMS app is killer and the fact that it is organized by conversations (rather than the standard inbox/sent paradigm) is a god send - you clear conversations when they are complete and suprisingly, i don't feel a need to *have* to archive my SMS threads. however, this would be an added feature in the future not to mention a slew of other features to organize your threads by differing states and/or contexts. all in all, i'm impressed.

    i can't wait for the ultimate integration of IM, email, social net app, SMS - Google has the beginnings of it via Google Mail - they just gotta keep running!

blog comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe

Receive new posts by email

Recent Posts