January 20th, 2008

Why I’ve Started Using Twitter Again

by Scott Karp

So I’m going to try using Twitter again. Why, after having caused such a (unintended) fuss when I stopped?

  • Twitter continues to be a flashpoint for innovative thinking — I’ve read too much interesting talk about Twitter not to be tuned in (and I need to eat my own dog food about giving new technologies a chance)
  • I’m curious whether a different approach to Twitter will yield different results — I learned a lot from using it the first time, and from stopping — but I think there’s more to learn
  • I continue to have thoughts pass through my head that I want to share, but don’t have a place to do so (without creating a dedicated feed on my blog)

So here’s the first principle of my new approach to Twitter — only follow people I actually know. I’m defining “know” pretty broadly, e.g. met at a conference, corresponded by email, etc. There are a few exceptions, including carry-overs from my last run with Twitter, e.g. people whose Tweeting I enjoyed following and/or who are followed by people I follow (i.e. to help the half conversation problem).

So I slashed and burned my Twitter following from over 300 to about 40.

To anyone I stopped following — please don’t take it personally. It was an aggressive downsizing, aiming for under 40, done quickly and without over-thinking. It isn’t set in stone and will likely change if the experiment goes well.

The second principle is to narrow down my Twitter use cases, to keep it focused and not let it get overwhelming as it did last time.

Here are the use cases, some of which have been widely discussed by the Twitterati:

  • Ambient intimacy
  • Ask questions of my network — and answer their questions
  • Complain about stuff that bothers me and pretend that someone might be listening — and maybe even find a solution

And I’m going to try to keep tweeting about twitter to a minimum.

So you can find me again at twitter.com/scottkarp.

One thing I will observe now is how interesting it was to discover ads being run by Twitterrific, the Mac client for Twitter — but no ads by Twitter. I’m very interested in the business strategy of creating economic value for other businesses as a way to drive value, symbiotically, back to your own — so I’m curious to see how Twitter does with this strategy.

twitterific-ad.jpg

  • Ken -- if you've got too much clutter, then you opt-out of those who provide the clutter.

    The "Public Timeline" is not a good gauge. Twitter is best with a reasonable circle of like-minded people - all able to query the hive-mind when necessary.

    Trust me. I've experimented with larger circles, and while interesting, I'm getting less out of it. I am in the process of pruning back my follow list to those who actually engage *me* and not just my interests.

  • I've yet to see a Twitter site that is worth following. As it is, there's too much information on the Net. Twitter just adds to the clutter.

  • Your only following 50 of your 450 followers back... what's up with that?!?!

  • Hi Scott...

    Then, there are the times when I have had a few moments to just read the Twitter stream. Like when Peter Shankman had just landed in San Francisco, and needed quick info on the BARTA schedule. A quick search on my part, and he had the mobile site that gave him everything he needed.

    Twitter isn't a hammer that you need every day, but it can be the specialty tool that you didn't know you couldn't live without. Like you've said, it is so simple that most people don't know what to do with it. So be creative.

  • I think there are multiple levels of thinking and thus we use different tools to document that self expression. I have multiple blogs for different interests and then twitter for the mini-thoughts that cant be blogged.

    First time commenter and new follower

blog comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe

Receive new posts by email

Recent Posts