February 10th, 2008

The Pace of Innovation in Journalism

by

How long does it take to launch an innovative new feature on a newspaper site? About 48 hours — that’s the standard set by innovative editors like Jack Lail at Knoxnews.com, Tom Meagher at Herald News, and Mark Briggs at Thenewstribune.com.

About two weeks ago, I emailed Jack Lail with the seed of what became the Publish2 Election News Network. We brainstormed by phone on Tuesday afternoon about using Publish2 to aggregated primary election news headlines from around Tennessee and around the web and publish them on Knoxnews.com. The primary was a week away at that point, but Jack said let’s do it.

Even before I could give Jack our javascript widget for publishing the headlines, that evening he emailed me a link to a mock-up page with the an RSS-to-HMTL conversion he created with a hacked Perl script. Wow.

He had also hatched a plan to get some bloggers in the Knoxville Blogger Network, which Knoxnews.com publishes, to pitch in with the journalists. In less than 8 hours, we had not only an experiment in news aggregation but a pro-am networked journalism experiment as well.

The next day, with the help of Knoxnews.com reporter and blogger Mike Silence, they rounded up a team and got them registered and set up on Publish2. Jack had a great instinct for keeping it simple enough for everyone to easily and quickly understand — he called it a “group link blog,” which is exactly what is was.

This page went up on Knoxnews.com on Wednesday, and we were off to the races. (Check out the subtitle: “Links to the best election news we can find” – can’t make the value proposition clearer or simpler than that.)

Elapsed time — about 48 hours.

Jack also wrote a piece about what they were doing, calling it a “ground breaking experiment.”

“Experiment” has not traditionally been part of the print publishing vocabulary, where the costs to try something and the costs of failure are great. But now, as Dave Cohn tirelessly points out, “Trying stuff is cheaper than deciding whether to try it,” i.e. the costs of deciding whether to experiment — and missing opportunities — is actually greater than experimenting and failing.

So now that Jack is in the mode of experimenting with Publish2, he’s coming up with lot’s of ideas for quick and easy innovation. Yesterday, he emailed me this:

An example of a simple one-time use of the publish2 bookmarking system.

I wanted some blogger reactions to go with this story

http://knoxnews.com/news/2008/feb/09/parks-gun-ban-under-fire/

(Obviously, the nation’s most visited park, The Great Smoky Mountains National Park, is a big news interest in our area.)

I searched around blogsearch.google.com and some other sources and bookmarked a few links with a “parkguns” tag and reformatted the rss feed with a modified version of the perl script I used for the election headlines.

Quickly, I had a “react” block of headlines I could add to the story.

knoxnews-bloggers-react.jpg

Jack didn’t call a committee meeting to debate whether this might be a good idea — he just did it. And now he has a great example to show editors and reporters.

Leading by example is essential to rapid innovation — it’s so much more powerful to see what something actually looks like than to speculate on what it MIGHT look like. The images in this post and the links to live examples are far more useful than any of my exposition.

(Worth noting how Jack used Google blog search to find interesting items, added his own intelligence to Google’s raw data, then combined that with original content to create a destination page for this news story that no algorithm could beat.)

I saw a similar rapid turnaround last week from Tom Meagher, the city editor at the Herald News in New Jersey.

Yoni Greenbaum mentioned the Publish2 Election News Network to Tom on the Thursday before Super Tuesday. I followed up with Tom on Friday. On Monday, he wrote me back saying he and some other folks at Herald News had registered for Publish2 and wanted to get started.

The next morning, they had an election news headline feed up on their main site and also their election blog:

herald-news-publish2.jpg

At one point on Tuesday, I saw Tom and another Herald News journalist had bookmarked some items without the tag that automatically places the bookmark in their headline feed. I pinged him with a reminder, and he wrote back:

Yeah, we bookmarked some things to share with the 2008 Election topic group that we didn’t need to tag for our feed.

That is, stuff we produced that we thought was cool and others in the ENN might be interested in.

Wow — that’s precisely one of the big advantages of the Publish2 network (vs. say a private Reddit) — the ability to share content across newsrooms, and get national distribution for local content through the editorial network. (More on that in another post — there’s a huge opportunity to reinvent the distribution of local content through a network of journalists and editors.)

But I didn’t tell Herald News to do this — by experimenting with the network, an innovative approach to distribution suddenly became evident. But they never would have discovered it if they hadn’t tried it. Without experimentation, there’s no discovery.

The same thing happened when I emailed Mark Briggs at Thenewstribune.com last Wednesday, three days before the Washington state caucus. On Thursday, Mark started getting journalists registered for Publish2, and that afternoon he got this page up:

thenewstribune-publish2.jpg

Of course, Mark literally wrote the book on Journalism 2.0, but he sure does practice what he preaches.

Here’s what Mark wrote about the nascent effort:

Here’s a roundup of the best Washington election coverage that can be found on the web. It’s the product of a social bookmarking experiment where journalists from The News Tribune and other area newspapers collaborate with political bloggers and others to compile a reading list of coverage from all around the web.

All of the examples above are still works in progress — as Mark openly admits in his post — the aim is not to succeed overnight, but to decide overnight to start experimenting and learning.

Many news organizations still approach innovation based on planning and development cycles measured in months (or longer), when the time frame should be measured in days or weeks.

On the web, with cost of technology so low (or, in the case of Publish2, free), innovation can happen very fast and very cheap simply by TRYING.

The news business — and the journalism it supports — can no longer afford to wait for innovation to happen in due time. It needs to happen NOW.

Fortunately, there are plenty of innovators like Jack, Tom, and Mark leading the way, and the threshold for trying something new is getting lower everyday — even as the imperative to do so gets higher.

——

If you’re interested in being part of the Publish2 Election News Network — or using Publish2 for any other news aggregation experiment — email me at scott.karp at publish2 dot com. We’ll have you up and running in 48 hours. Or less.

(And you don’t need to be able to hack perl scripts like Jack — we’ve got a plug and play widget you can put on your site — we can even customize the formating for you.)

You can register for Publish2 here.

Comments (10 Responses so far)

  1. Speaking of innovation, I did some third party analysis on Fast Company’s launch of their new community site:

    http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2008/02/09/an-initial-analysis-of-the-fast-company-community/

  2. [...] Karp has a post, The Pace of Innovation in Journalism, at Publishing 2.0 that argues that time is now 48 hours. On the web, with cost of technology so [...]

  3. [...] about inspiring them to be able to launch innovative new features on their websites within 48 [...]

  4. One reason innovation “lags” in publishing is because you need time to sell the new product. You also need to have buyers.

    There are lots of cool things you can do on a web site given a few hours. But innovation without a revenue plan sounds a lot like the original dotcom bust.

  5. [...] The Pace of Innovation in Journalism How long does it take to launch an innovative new feature on a newspaper site? About 48 hours — that’s the standard set by innovative editors like Jack Lail at Knoxnews.com, Tom Meagher at Herald News, and Mark Briggs at Thenewstribune.com. (tags: journalism newspapers newspaper+websites innovation) [...]

  6. [...] The Pace of Innovation in Journalism. Scott Karp hits on something that the too-cautious newspaper industry needs to learn: the time between a good idea scratched on a napkin and “product launch” has been reduced to as little as 48 hours. A thought: if there was a lesser fear of failure — a willingness to try and, if necessary, abandon — would we see more innovation? [...]

  7. [...] Seen at Michael Silence’s place: How long does it take to launch an innovative new feature on a newspaper site? About 48 hours. [...]

  8. [...] 3:20 AM Scott Karp / Publishing 2.0: The Pace of Innovation in Journalism [...]

  9. [...] piece over at Publisher 2.0 about an experiment in getting smart folks to get together to aggregate news about the presidential [...]

  10. [...] Quick sidebar on the pace of innovation: [...]

Add Your Comment

Subscribe

Receive new posts by email