June 16th, 2008

Associated Press Hands Local And National News Sites An Opportunity To Get Links And Traffic


The Associated Press is facing a blog firestorm after issuing take down notices to Drudge Retort for linking to and reproducing snippets of AP stories. AP is now attempting to define how their stories can be linked to and excerpted — and the response from the blogosphere appears to be to boycott the AP, i.e. not link at all. This is a huge opportunity for local and national news sites to be the sources that bloggers and social news sites link to instead of the AP.

Take the story of flooding in Iowa, for example. The AP is covering this story extensively, as you can see in this Google News search result. But local news media in Iowa is also covering the story extensively, as you can see in this search limited to Iowa sources — the story is happening in their own backyard, giving these local sources a unique perspective and knowledge.

So if a blogger wanted to discuss the Iowa floods and needed a source to cite, they can easily find an original local source instead of the AP story. And they can think of the link and the traffic they send as a contribution to the local news outlet’s original reporting, particularly the local newspapers struggling with new economic realities.

Or let’s take a national example. Britain and the EU have announced new sanctions against Iran. The AP covered this story, but so did national news sites like the Washington Post. Link to the Post instead, to support their original reporting.

To seize this opportunity, national and local news sites could get the word out to bloggers that they want the links and the traffic, if AP doesn’t. It’s up to them whether they agree with AP’s attempt to copyright the commodity of the news event itself (via Saul Hansell):

“The principal question is whether the excerpt is a substitute for the story, or some established adaptation of the story,” said Timothy Wu, a professor at the Columbia Law School. Mr. Wu said that the case is not clear-cut, but he believes that The A.P. is likely to lose a court case to assert a claim on that issue.

“It’s hard to see how the Drudge Retort ‘first few lines’ is a substitute for the story,” Mr. Wu said.

Mr. Kennedy argued, however, that The Associated Press believes that in some cases, the essence of an article can be encapsulated in very few words.

The problem with this argument is that, if the “essence of the article” is the fact of the event itself, e.g. floods in IA, and that is the entire value of the content, then the content is sorely lacking in value. If local and national news sites can create more value than just the commodity statement of the facts, which be “given away” in a snippet, then they can earn all of the links and traffic on the web for their original reporting. They should also look at how they allocate resources to creating original content that people want to and can link to vs. licensing content that nobody wants to or can link to (especially when that same licensed content appears on Google, Yahoo, and hundreds of other sites).

If local and national news sites really want to seize the opportunity, they won’t just leave it to bloggers to link to their original reporting — they will start linking to each other’s original reporting, and help each other capture that economic value, which they so clearly need.

  • This is definitely great for local news outlets - they do deserve the recognition - especially since the AP has been so stuffy on this linking issue.

  • dwight "D"

    "an informed citizenry is the guardian of democracy."

  • pr

    There's an underlying assumption behind many blogger's arrogance and it's expressed in some comments here.

    "There's always another source"... well, so far that's true but let's look into a potential future for a moment. A major news event happens. The local newspaper has gone out of business. The TV and radio stations used to depend on the newspaper for a porton of content at least but that's gone now. A few dedicated bloggers are willing to put in the time and effort to call authorities but they get stonewalled. Since they must rely on "citizen journalism" the reports that do come in are spotty, and incomplete. A few photos show up. A quick grainy cell phone video appears. Then the opinion bloggers get into it and the story starts to be shaped by the blogosphere into something that is wildly untrue and potentially damaging.

    The purpose of journalism school and training is to hopefully produce a clear eye, a factual voice, and an understanding of verification. Not much of that exists in the blogosphere. This nation, and in fact any advanced democracy depends on an informed (and accurately informed) citizenry. Has the 'mainstream press' failed in that responsibility? Many would say yes...but if it dies at the hands of 'mob rule' and truly trusted sources are relegated to people typing away in their laundry rooms then God help us all. It's ludicrous to believe that 'news by casual observer' will be better and that the blogosphere will be 'self policed'. Blogging as a source for news is not a reliable or dependable vehicle for the purpose of informing the public.

  • AP has given us (every user) the opportunity to realize how much we don't need them, much like the writer's strike helped us to realize we do not need network tv. Thanks huge traditional media for helping us see how much we don't need you.

  • The news world is currently in transition. As with the Wall Street Journal and its change, there are those who will work against it, those who aren't quite sure what to do, and those who will take the lead and run with it. Bloggers shouldn't be surprised that it's come to this. Great "news" item, you've taken the lead and run!

blog comments powered by Disqus


Receive new posts by email

Recent Posts