<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolution of the Newswire on the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://publishing2.com/2008/09/11/evolution-of-the-newswire-on-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://publishing2.com/2008/09/11/evolution-of-the-newswire-on-the-web/</link>
	<description>The (r)Eevolution of Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:23:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Burden</title>
		<link>http://publishing2.com/2008/09/11/evolution-of-the-newswire-on-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-540607</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Burden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing2.com/?p=1119#comment-540607</guid>
		<description>Thanks for including my comment here, Scott. Yes, the web is a pretty good newswire, especially if you do some work and aggregate a bunch of RSS feeds (from major news sites but also from aggregators and search engines) together and filter them through something like Y! pipes. Even a non-programmer could make something for his org that worked pretty close to the way AP&#039;s wire works, and a programmer could make it work EXACTLY the same.

Platforms like yours will make this even easier.

I think it&#039;s a really big problem, and a disservice to the web, its users, and news companies themselves when they put copies of the same story in multiple locations on the web. It serves nobody, and in fact makes our news gathering experience harder by gumming up aggregators. Content sharing - the practice of putting the same content in many different locations - should be a crime. Yet that&#039;s the model AP works on.

Aggregators need to get better at crap-filtering, duplication-avoidance, and crediting original sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for including my comment here, Scott. Yes, the web is a pretty good newswire, especially if you do some work and aggregate a bunch of RSS feeds (from major news sites but also from aggregators and search engines) together and filter them through something like Y! pipes. Even a non-programmer could make something for his org that worked pretty close to the way AP&#8217;s wire works, and a programmer could make it work EXACTLY the same.</p>
<p>Platforms like yours will make this even easier.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a really big problem, and a disservice to the web, its users, and news companies themselves when they put copies of the same story in multiple locations on the web. It serves nobody, and in fact makes our news gathering experience harder by gumming up aggregators. Content sharing &#8211; the practice of putting the same content in many different locations &#8211; should be a crime. Yet that&#8217;s the model AP works on.</p>
<p>Aggregators need to get better at crap-filtering, duplication-avoidance, and crediting original sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: publishing2.com @ 2010-07-30 18:06:15 -->