September 15th, 2008

Drudge Report: News Site That Sends Readers Away With Links Has Highest Engagement

by

There are two main reasons why news sites are reluctant to send readers away by linking to third-party content. First, you shouldn’t send people away or else they won’t come back to your site. Second, a page with links that sends people away has low engagement, which doesn’t serve advertisers well.

But if you actually look at the data, both of these assumptions are completely wrong.

Here’s a list of the top 30 news sites for May 2008, ranked by sessions per person (source: Nielsen Online):

And here’s a list of top news sites for June 2008, ranked by time per person (source: Nielsen Online):

What do you notice about the top site on both lists?

First, the top site has twice as many sessions per person. Second, the top site has nearly twice as much time spent per person. So users of this site find it indispensible, and they are highly engaged.

But the most important difference between the top site and all the other sites, is that this top site — Drudge — has nothing but LINKS.

That’s right folks. Drudge beats every original content news site by a two to one margin.

Drudge is also one of the largest news sites that isn’t built on an offline brand or a communications portal.

Still thinks sending people away with links is not a good strategy online?

Ask Google. They do pretty well.

Oh, and here’s a dirty little secret of sites like NYTimes.com — you would think their high quality, in-depth content would yield engagement numbers that could beat Drudge. But these metrics are averages of all site visitors, and the averages of the original content sites are being dragged down because many of the unique visitors come from sites like… Drudge and Google — and those visitors are not devoted users.

Drudge, on the other hand, is probably close to 100% devoted users.

What kind of users do you want your site to have?

And here’s another dirty little secret — Drudge is one of (if not the) largest referrer of traffic to most of the newspapers on these lists.

But all of these sites are content (pun intended) just to chase traffic from Drudge.

Here’s one last bit of data — from Drudge’s media kit:

Page view statistics
500 million page views monthly
1.95 billion ad impressions monthly
12 million unique visitors monthly
1.75 million daily unique visitors (weekday)
1 million daily unique visitors (weekend day)

Assuming 60% sell-through at $4 CPM… that’s $56 million annual revenue.

One guy. Linking.

Why was it again that your news site doesn’t link out?

UPDATE

Some commenters are taking issue with the data:

Drudge’s session numbers are worthless. Unlike every site on the list, Drudge has an artificially high auto-refresh rate of something under 3 minutes, I think it might even be as low as 2 minutes. The conclusions are fairly obvious– every person who leaves Drudge’s page open in a new tab, or leaves their desk for lunch created dozens or even hundreds of “new” sessions.

I find it ironic that most of these commenters came here from Techmeme, a site that has nothing but links and that auto-refreshes. Techmeme, like Drudge, is INDISPENSIBLE for its users, something any news site should want to claim. And Techmeme has found the key to unlokcing value for advertisiers (hint: it’s not display ads) — sponsorships in the form of content links, just like Techeme’s editorial content.

And really, what news site wouldn’t want to be open in a reader’s browser being refreshed all day, instead of hoping for drive-by referrals from aggregators?

  • sherrithornhill

    Well I'm going to be unafraid to add links to my articles and give it a try!

  • What I detect here is envy , jealousy, and covetessness.

    You critics wallow in your own misery wishing you had dreamed up the same format.

  • Hey Caroline,

    Would you be complaining if you owned the site? The point is that you may not like his tactics but you are talking about it. You are reading it. And you are adding to the global discussion.

    What newspaper allowed that kind of instant access? Now newspapers have sites but often they mismanage or outright lie about their comments as in the case of the SF Chronicle "incident."

    Whether his numbers are whacked or not, the site is big time and for that he has you and everyone else commenting to thank.

  • Caroline

    Drudge makes millions off the work of other reporters and editors. Without the news outlets you trash he'd have maybe one article per month on his site that he's written. He's using their work without paying them to make millions in profit as a news organization in his own right.

    Second, his numbers obviously are whacked. A few weeks ago he posted at the top right column of his page a thanks and the number of visits -- the monthly visits to his site were MORE THAN DOUBLE the entire population in the United States and the yearly figure was just shy of the entire population on the planet.

  • BU COMM stated:

    "So, a newspaper’s value is no longer in its thoughtful presentation of information, but rather in its individual stories. With this emphasis on the story, journalists are motivated to write sensationalized content, so their work is linked to from another site."

    This is all about transparency and objectivity. You mean to tell us that the NY Time, Fox, and other news agencies do NOT have their own agendas?

    You mean all the Sarah Palin fawning going on over at Fox is just my imagination running wild?

    Let's get something straight. A newspaper's value is no longer in print it is online. And as every paper in America is quickly realizing, they NO longer hold the keys to the vault.

    If you can't stomach what Drudge and other sites are doing in "shaping" our reading habits then consider all the American newspapers that have lied to the American public for the past 100+ years.

    Get used to the world of reporting and information as you knew it is gone-

blog comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe

Receive new posts by email

Recent Posts